Simply Put Psych

View Original

What Was the Bobo Doll Experiment (1961)?

The Bobo Doll Experiment, conducted by Albert Bandura, Dorothea Ross, and Sheila A. Ross in 1961, remains one of the most influential studies in the history of social psychology. Officially titled "Transmission of Aggression Through Imitation of Aggressive Models," the experiment was designed to investigate whether children imitate aggressive behaviors exhibited by adults. The findings not only provided compelling evidence for the social learning theory but also sparked widespread discussion about how violence in media and social environments influences behavior, particularly in children. This article explores the experiment’s design, findings, and broader implications.

Background and Hypothesis

The researchers hypothesized that children would imitate aggressive behavior observed in adults, even in the absence of the adult model. This hypothesis was grounded in Bandura's developing theory of observational learning, which proposed that people learn new behaviors not only through direct experience but also by observing and imitating others. At the time, this idea challenged prevailing behaviorist theories, which largely emphasized reinforcement and punishment as the primary mechanisms for learning.

The researchers also aimed to investigate whether factors like the gender of the model and the gender of the child would influence the likelihood of imitation.

Experiment Design

The Bobo Doll Experiment involved 72 children (36 boys and 36 girls) between the ages of 3 and 6 years, recruited from the Stanford University nursery school. The participants were randomly assigned to one of three experimental conditions:

  1. Aggressive Model Group: The child observed an adult model behaving aggressively toward a large, inflatable Bobo doll (a clown-like toy). The adult performed novel, specific aggressive acts, such as punching the doll, hitting it with a mallet, and shouting phrases like "Sock him!" and "Pow!"

  2. Non-Aggressive Model Group: The child observed an adult model playing quietly with non-aggressive toys (e.g., Tinkertoys) while ignoring the Bobo doll.

  3. Control Group: The child was not exposed to any adult model.

After observing the model, the child was subjected to a mild frustration phase to elicit emotional arousal. During this phase, the child was taken to a room with attractive toys but was told they could not play with them. Finally, the child was brought into a third room filled with a mix of toys, including both aggressive options (e.g., a mallet, a toy gun, and the Bobo doll) and non-aggressive options (e.g., tea sets and dolls). The child’s behaviour was then observed for 20 minutes through a one-way mirror by two independent raters who recorded instances of both imitative aggression (copying the specific actions of the model) and non-imitative aggression (general aggressive behaviour like kicking or throwing the doll).

Results

The study’s results supported the researchers’ hypothesis and revealed several key findings:

  1. Imitation of Aggressive Behavior: Children who observed the aggressive model were far more likely to imitate both the specific aggressive acts (e.g., hitting the Bobo doll with the mallet) and verbal aggression (e.g., shouting "Sock him!") they had seen. In contrast, children in the non-aggressive and control groups displayed significantly fewer aggressive behaviors.

  2. Gender Differences:

    • Boys were more likely to imitate physical aggression than girls, particularly when the model was male.

    • Girls were more likely to imitate verbal aggression when exposed to a female model.

    • Overall, male models had a stronger influence on both boys and girls than female models.

  3. General Aggression: Beyond imitating the specific acts of aggression modelled, children in the aggressive model condition exhibited more general aggressive behaviours, such as kicking or throwing the Bobo doll.

Evaluation of the Study

The Bobo Doll Experiment is widely regarded as a landmark study in psychology for its methodological rigor, innovative design, and significant implications. However, like any experiment, it has strengths and limitations.

Strengths

  • Ground-breaking Contribution: The study provided robust empirical evidence for Bandura’s social learning theory, challenging dominant behaviourist views that focused exclusively on direct reinforcement.

  • Controlled Experimental Design: By randomly assigning participants to different conditions and including both aggressive and non-aggressive models, the study ensured that the effects observed could be attributed to the modelling of aggression.

  • Quantitative and Qualitative Observations: The use of both structured tallies of aggressive acts and qualitative descriptions of behaviour added depth to the findings.

Limitations

  1. Artificial Setting: The laboratory environment was highly controlled and artificial, which raises questions about whether the results can be generalized to real-world situations. For example, a Bobo doll is designed to bounce back when hit, which may encourage aggression in ways that real-life scenarios would not.

  2. Sample Size and Diversity: The sample consisted of only 72 children, all from the same nursery school, limiting the study’s generalizability to broader populations.

  3. Ethical Concerns: Exposing young children to aggressive behavior and potentially encouraging imitation raises ethical questions. The long-term effects on the children’s behaviour were not studied, leaving open the possibility that the experiment may have had unintended consequences.

  4. Short-Term Focus: The study only measured immediate aggression and did not assess whether the observed behaviors persisted over time.

Broader Implications

The Bobo Doll Experiment has had far-reaching implications in psychology, education, and media studies. It demonstrated that children learn behaviors through observation and imitation, even in the absence of direct reinforcement. This insight has influenced:

  • Parenting and Education: The study underscored the importance of modeling positive behaviors for children and avoiding exposure to aggressive role models.

  • Media Violence Research: Bandura’s findings sparked decades of research on the effects of violent media on children’s behavior. Studies continue to examine how exposure to violence in television, video games, and other media contributes to aggression.

  • Social Policy: The study has informed public policies aimed at reducing children’s exposure to violence, such as content ratings for TV shows and video games.

Simply Put

The Bobo Doll Experiment (1961) remains a cornerstone of social psychology and a testament to the power of observational learning. By demonstrating that children imitate the behaviours of adult role models—both positive and negative—the study reshaped our understanding of how social environments influence behaviour. While the experiment has its limitations, its findings have inspired countless subsequent studies and continue to inform debates about aggression, media influence, and the socialization of children. Over six decades later, Bandura’s work remains as relevant as ever, reminding us of the profound impact that observation and imitation have on human behavior.

References

Bandura, A., Ross, D., & Ross, S. A. (1961). Transmission of aggression through imitation of aggressive models. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 63(3), 575–582.

Bandura, A. (1962). Social Learning through Imitation. In M. R. Jones (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (pp. 211-269). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.

Bandura, A. (1977). Social Learning Theory. Prentice-Hall.

Bandura, A., Ross, D., & Ross, S. A. (1963). Imitation of film-mediated aggressive models. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology.

Grusec, J. E. (1992). Social learning theory and developmental psychology: The legacies of Robert Sears and Albert Bandura.

See this content in the original post