Eco-Grief and Its Impact on Mental Health

Depressed Statue, reflecting Eco Grief

In recent years, the cascading effects of climate change and ecological degradation have become ever more apparent—record-breaking temperatures, increasingly frequent natural disasters, and the rapid loss of species. As individuals and communities witness these changes, many experience a profound emotional response that scholars and mental health professionals have termed eco-grief (also referred to as climate grief or ecological grief). Once an underrecognized concept, eco-grief has emerged as a crucial area of study at the intersection of environmental issues and mental health. This comprehensive resource explores the origins of eco-grief, its psychological dimensions and impact on well-being, and the strategies that individuals and communities can adopt to cope with and respond to the emotional toll of ecological loss.

Introduction

Climate change is no longer an abstract projection; for many, it is a lived reality. Wildfires, droughts, superstorms, melting ice caps, and rising sea levels have become recurring headlines that highlight the extent to which humans and other living beings are vulnerable to environmental shifts. Governments, corporations, and civil society organizations have begun to acknowledge the gravity of environmental challenges, but solutions often seem slow-moving or insufficient given the urgency of the crisis.

Eco-grief is a term that captures the deep sadness, anxiety, despair, and sometimes even anger that arise in response to environmental decline. It reflects the broad spectrum of emotions tied to the sense of loss—loss of biodiversity, loss of stability in the climate, and loss of hope for a future unburdened by ecological disasters. Although grief traditionally refers to the emotional process of dealing with the death of a loved one, environmental destruction can elicit a strikingly similar depth of emotion, compelling us to grieve the loss of familiar ecosystems and the fear of worse changes yet to come.

Defining Eco-Grief

Eco-grief has been defined by researchers like Cunsolo and Ellis (2018) as a form of psychological or emotional response to environmental destruction or change, especially in cases where individuals have strong connections to the natural world. In this sense, eco-grief parallels other forms of grief, involving mourning, sadness, anger, and a sense of helplessness. Unlike grief over a personal loss, however, eco-grief is often communal and global in scope—shared by people who may not know each other yet are intimately linked by an ever-changing planet.

Individuals may experience eco-grief when they:

  • Witness or learn about the rapid extinction of species and the loss of biodiversity.

  • Live through extreme weather events, such as hurricanes, wildfires, or droughts, and recognize them as signs of a larger climate crisis.

  • Observe the decline of local green spaces, coral reefs, and other cherished ecosystems.

  • Worry about how climate change will impact future generations, from children to grandchildren.

Unlike most personal grief, eco-grief is often overshadowed by feelings of anticipatory anxiety—the apprehension about environmental damage that has yet to fully manifest, but seems all but inevitable given current scientific projections. This forward-looking dread can compound the despair many already feel.

Causes and Triggers of Eco-Grief

Eco-grief can be triggered by both direct and indirect experiences of environmental degradation. These triggers might include:

  1. Personal Encounters With Climate Disasters
    Individuals who lose homes, livelihoods, or loved ones to climate-related disasters—such as hurricanes, floods, or wildfires—experience an acute form of grief. This grief may expand beyond the personal to encompass a profound sorrow for the broader environmental and social disruptions caused by these events.

  2. Displacement and Relocation
    Those who are forced to relocate because their homes become uninhabitable—due to coastal erosion, desertification, or the aftermath of a natural disaster—may experience a deeper form of loss related to a disrupted sense of place. Geographical displacement uproots people from their cultural identity, social networks, and familiar landscapes, intensifying the emotional toll.

  3. Loss of Biodiversity
    Many people feel a sense of wonder and solace in nature, and when local ecosystems experience a decline—dying trees, reduced wildlife, polluted waterways—this degradation can spark significant sadness and anxiety.

  4. Seeing Global Changes via Media
    Even individuals not directly affected by climate disasters may experience eco-grief through exposure to distressing media reports, scientific predictions, and imagery depicting environmental harm around the world. Modern communication technologies allow us to witness the severity of climate events in real time, leaving many feeling overwhelmed by their inability to help.

  5. Moral and Ethical Dilemmas
    Many grapple with the ethical questions posed by climate change. Realizing that day-to-day human activities—driving cars, consuming fast fashion, eating high on the food chain—may contribute to planetary harm often triggers guilt, frustration, and helplessness.

Psychological Dimensions of Eco-Grief

While the emotional toll of eco-grief can resemble other forms of grief, it also encompasses specific psychological dimensions linked to the environmental context.

  1. Sadness and Mourning
    A hallmark of eco-grief is a palpable sense of mourning over the loss of environmental stability or the disappearance of beloved species and places. This emotional response mirrors the stages of grief in which sadness is often the most enduring phase.

  2. Anxiety and Fear
    Anxiety related to environmental change is a foundational aspect of eco-grief. Individuals may feel persistent worry about the future, concern for children and grandchildren, and fear of imminent climate disasters. Research indicates that this chronic anxiety can contribute to generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) and other anxiety-related conditions (Berry, Bowen, & Kjellstrom, 2010).

  3. Anger and Frustration
    Eco-grief can also involve anger towards perceived inaction by governments, corporations, and global institutions. People may feel an urgent need for systemic changes that are not materializing, leading to frustration and a sense of powerlessness (Doherty & Clayton, 2011).

  4. Existential and Spiritual Distress
    Many individuals and communities hold spiritual or moral beliefs that closely tie human life to nature. The destruction of the environment and the mass suffering of nonhuman species can challenge these core beliefs, leading to existential crises and spiritual anguish (Albrecht, 2011).

  5. Sense of Helplessness
    Feeling overwhelmed by the enormity of climate change can fuel hopelessness, especially when individual actions—like recycling, turning off lights, or reducing plastic use—seem negligible relative to the scale of global environmental challenges. This sense of helplessness may contribute to depressive symptoms.

The Impact on Mental Health

Eco-grief’s emotional complexity can have a pronounced impact on mental well-being. It does not merely represent a passing feeling of sadness; for many, it develops into more persistent and clinically recognizable mental health conditions.

  1. Depression
    Chronic sorrow, amplified by a sense of hopelessness, can evolve into clinical depression. Individuals may struggle to find motivation or pleasure in daily activities, feeling that their efforts to mitigate environmental harm are futile (Fritze et al., 2008).

  2. Anxiety Disorders
    Beyond general worry, eco-grief can manifest in panic attacks, sleep disturbances, and obsessive rumination about environmental threats. Those who experience repeated exposures to distressing climate news may develop heightened stress responses that resemble symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) (Reser, Bradley, & Ellul, 2012).

  3. Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)
    PTSD can develop in individuals directly impacted by climate catastrophes. The trauma of losing a home, livelihood, or community infrastructure—combined with the lingering dread of further disasters—can anchor individuals in a loop of hypervigilance and re-experiencing, where they constantly relive the original traumatic event (Doherty & Clayton, 2011).

  4. Eco-Anxiety in Youth
    Young people are uniquely vulnerable to eco-grief, as they tend to have a more acute sense of the future’s fragility. They recognize that decisions made today will define the planetary conditions of their adult years. Surveys indicate that a significant number of children and adolescents experience heightened eco-anxiety, often expressing fears about inherited environmental burdens (Hickman et al., 2021). This anxiety can impair academic performance, social development, and overall well-being.

Populations More Vulnerable to Eco-Grief

Though eco-grief can affect anyone aware of environmental degradation, certain populations are especially susceptible:

  • Indigenous Communities: Indigenous peoples often have deep cultural and spiritual ties to their ancestral lands. Environmental destruction directly threatens not only their livelihoods but also their cultural practices and identity (Tschakert, Tutu, & Alcaro, 2013).

  • Farmers and Fishers: Their livelihoods depend on the health of ecosystems. Climate changes—such as erratic rainfall patterns, invasive pests, and declining fish stocks—can cause anxiety, financial strain, and a sense of loss regarding generational knowledge.

  • Coastal and Island Communities: Rising sea levels and coastal erosion pose immediate threats to those living in low-lying areas. The prospect of relocation and the potential obliteration of cultural heritage sites can severely impact mental health.

  • Urban Poor: Socioeconomic disadvantage amplifies susceptibility to the mental health impacts of climate change. Lack of access to resources—such as healthcare, mental health support, and climate-resilient infrastructure—leaves marginalized communities at higher risk of psychological distress.

  • Children and Adolescents: As noted, younger generations frequently report intense climate worries, given they will inherit the long-term consequences of today’s policies and ecological disruptions.

Coping Mechanisms and Strategies for Individuals

Given the far-reaching implications of eco-grief, learning effective coping strategies can help mitigate its impact on mental health and foster resilience.

  1. Psychotherapy and Counseling
    Individual or group therapy can be instrumental in helping people navigate eco-grief. Therapeutic modalities such as Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy (CBT) offer tools for reframing negative thought patterns, developing healthy coping mechanisms, and regaining a sense of agency (Doherty & Clayton, 2011). Counselors trained in environmental or climate psychology can provide specialized support.

  2. Mindfulness and Nature Therapy
    Engaging with nature is a potent method of reducing stress and improving mental well-being (Bratman et al., 2015). Activities such as forest bathing, gardening, or simply walking in a park can restore a sense of connectedness and calm. Mindfulness practices, which train individuals to focus on the present moment without judgment, can also alleviate anxiety tied to the uncertainty of the future.

  3. Personal Eco-Action Plans
    While individual actions alone cannot solve systemic environmental issues, taking proactive steps—such as reducing waste, supporting local conservation efforts, or transitioning to a plant-rich diet—can restore a sense of control and agency. The visible impact of these actions, no matter how small, can help counter feelings of helplessness.

  4. Building Emotional Resilience
    Techniques such as journaling, practicing gratitude, and setting boundaries around the consumption of distressing news can help individuals maintain emotional balance. Resilience involves recognizing that although climate change is a global crisis, individuals can manage their emotional reactions through self-care, social support, and strategic activism.

  5. Activism and Advocacy
    Channeling eco-grief into advocacy—for instance, volunteering for climate-focused nonprofits, organizing community cleanups, or participating in peaceful demonstrations—can transform feelings of despair into constructive engagement. Activism not only fosters collective solidarity but also offers a tangible way to push for policy changes that address systemic causes of climate change.

Community and Policy Interventions

Beyond individual strategies, communities, institutions, and governments play a pivotal role in addressing eco-grief by fostering supportive environments and implementing policies that mitigate climate impacts.

  1. Community Support Groups
    Sharing experiences with others who are similarly concerned about the environment can relieve feelings of isolation. Community-led groups, both in-person and online, provide safe spaces for open discussion, emotional support, and collaborative problem-solving (Koger & Winter, 2010).

  2. Ecotherapy and Group Nature Programs
    Community programs that center on nature—like local reforestation projects, communal gardens, or guided nature walks—can reduce stress and offer a sense of collective accomplishment. These gatherings also help individuals nurture deeper connections to the natural world, which in turn can bolster mental health.

  3. Education and Public Awareness Campaigns
    Misinformation about climate change can exacerbate eco-anxiety by blurring the line between evidence-based understanding and speculation. Ensuring widespread access to accurate, clear, and actionable information can empower communities to respond effectively (Moser & Dilling, 2007). Public workshops, school curriculums, and community events can all amplify awareness and hope.

  4. Climate-Responsive Policies and Infrastructure
    Government policies that prioritize renewable energy, protect biodiversity, and reduce pollution are critical for addressing the root causes of eco-grief. Climate-adaptive infrastructure—such as sea walls, resilient agriculture, and effective disaster-response systems—can help communities feel more secure, thereby reducing anxiety.

  5. Involving Mental Health Professionals in Climate Policy
    Mental health experts can guide policymakers on the psychological impacts of climate change, ensuring that mental health support is integrated into emergency relief and long-term planning. Collaboration between environmental agencies, mental health organizations, and community groups enhances resilience on multiple fronts (American Psychological Association & ecoAmerica).

Building Resilience for the Future

As the pace of environmental change continues to accelerate, eco-grief may become an increasingly common experience. However, the growing recognition of this phenomenon provides an opportunity for proactive measures that bolster resilience.

  1. Intersection of Social and Environmental Justice
    Climate change disproportionately affects already vulnerable or marginalized populations. Addressing systemic inequities—such as poverty, racism, and lack of healthcare—can reduce susceptibility to eco-grief. By fostering social justice, communities can become more resilient to both environmental and mental health challenges.

  2. Holistic Approaches to Sustainability
    Recognizing that humans are part of an interconnected biosphere can inspire holistic approaches to sustainability. Encouraging regenerative agriculture, supporting circular economies, and preserving biodiversity are crucial steps to restore ecosystems, alleviate climate threats, and in turn, reduce eco-grief triggers.

  3. Intergenerational Dialogue
    As climate changes progress, bridging gaps between generations is essential. Younger individuals often demand immediate and bold climate policies, while older generations may have different perspectives, shaped by historical contexts. Creating opportunities for listening and learning across ages can strengthen communal bonds and collective resolve.

  4. Media Responsibility
    News outlets and social media channels play an influential role in shaping public sentiment around climate issues. While it is vital that coverage remains transparent and evidence-based, excessive doom-centric reporting can intensify eco-grief. Balancing reporting on environmental crises with stories of hope, innovation, and successful interventions can motivate action rather than despair.

  5. Personal Empowerment and Collective Action
    The global scale of climate challenges requires collective efforts. Engaging in local sustainability projects—such as habitat restoration, rewilding, or grassroots campaigns—can mitigate the sense of futility. Individuals who witness direct positive outcomes from community efforts often experience renewed hope and motivation.

Simply Put

Eco-grief stands at the crossroads of environmental crisis and mental health, highlighting the profound emotional ties humans have to the natural world. As climate change intensifies, eco-grief may become more widespread, underscoring the need for comprehensive, multi-layered solutions. Although this emotional turmoil can be overwhelming, it also has the power to galvanize action and foster resilience. Acknowledging eco-grief is the first step in transforming it from paralyzing despair into a catalyst for positive change—personally, locally, and globally.

Whether through therapeutic interventions, community organizing, policy advocacy, or personal lifestyle changes, there are myriad ways to address eco-grief. By validating these emotions, practicing sustainable living, and nurturing a sense of interconnectedness, individuals and communities can navigate the profound uncertainties ahead. In doing so, eco-grief becomes not merely a symptom of ecological loss but a testament to the depth of our care for a living planet—and an invitation to reshape our world for the better.

References

  1. Cunsolo, A., & Ellis, N. R. (2018). Ecological grief as a mental health response to climate change-related loss. Nature Climate Change, 8(4), 275-281.

  2. Mental health and our changing climate: Impacts, implications, and guidance. American Psychological Association and ecoAmerica.

  3. Doherty, T. J., & Clayton, S. (2011). The psychological impacts of global climate change. American Psychologist, 66(4), 265-276.

  4. Albrecht, G. (2011). Chronic environmental change: Emerging "psychoterratic" syndromes. In Weissbecker, I. (Ed.), Climate change and human well-being (pp. 43-56). Springer.

  5. Fritze, J. G., Blashki, G. A., Burke, S., & Wiseman, J. (2008). Hope, despair and transformation: Climate change and the promotion of mental health and wellbeing. International Journal of Mental Health Systems, 2(1), 13.

  6. Berry, H. L., Bowen, K., & Kjellstrom, T. (2010). Climate change and mental health: A causal pathways framework. International Journal of Public Health, 55(2), 123-132.

  7. Tschakert, P., Tutu, R., & Alcaro, A. (2013). Embodied experiences of environmental and climatic changes in landscapes of everyday life in Ghana. Emotion, Space and Society, 7, 13-25.

  8. Hickman, C., Marks, E., Pihkala, P., Clayton, S., Lewandowski, R. E., Mayall, E. E., Wray, B., Mellor, C., & van Susteren, L. (2021). Climate anxiety in children and young people and their beliefs about government responses to climate change: A global survey. The Lancet Planetary Health, 5(12), e863-e873.

  9. Reser, J. P., Bradley, G. L., & Ellul, M. C. (2012). Coping with climate change: Bringing psychological adaptation in from the cold. Australian Psychologist, 47(3), 164-173.

  10. Koger, S. M., & Winter, D. D. (2010). The psychology of environmental problems: Psychology for sustainability (3rd ed.). Psychology Press.

  11. Moser, S. C., & Dilling, L. (2007). Creating a climate for change: Communicating climate change and facilitating social change. Cambridge University Press.

  12. Bratman, G. N., Hamilton, J. P., Hahn, K. S., Daily, G. C., & Gross, J. J. (2015). Nature experience reduces rumination and subgenual prefrontal cortex activation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(28), 8567-8572.

JC Pass

JC Pass is a specialist in social and political psychology who merges academic insight with cultural critique. With an MSc in Applied Social and Political Psychology and a BSc in Psychology, JC explores how power, identity, and influence shape everything from global politics to gaming culture. Their work spans political commentary, video game psychology, LGBTQIA+ allyship, and media analysis, all with a focus on how narratives, systems, and social forces affect real lives.

JC’s writing moves fluidly between the academic and the accessible, offering sharp, psychologically grounded takes on world leaders, fictional characters, player behaviour, and the mechanics of resilience in turbulent times. They also create resources for psychology students, making complex theory feel usable, relevant, and real.

https://SimplyPutPsych.co.uk/
Previous
Previous

How Climate Change Awareness Influences Consumer Behaviour

Next
Next

The Power of Defaults and Opt-Out Programs for Sustainable Choices