Why the Grass Is Always Greener: A Psychological Look at Idealization, Insecurity, and Social Comparison in Adolescence

Adolescence is a time of identity construction, emotional volatility, and a desperate hunger for belonging. In this landscape, teens often form attachments not just to romantic partners, but to the idea of their partner’s life, especially their family. At first glance, admiring a boyfriend or girlfriend’s parents might seem harmless, even sweet. But when the praise becomes relentless, comparative, and subtly weaponized, something deeper is going on. This isn't just admiration; it’s a mix of ingroup-outgroup psychology, passive-aggressive triangulation, social comparison, and relational aggression.

Idealization as Ingroup Formation

At the core of this dynamic is the psychological need to belong to a high-status group. Teens may idealize a partner’s family, especially if they seem wealthier, more functional, or emotionally "perfect" as a kind of personal upgrade. The logic becomes: If I’m with them, I’m better too.

This idealization comes out in comments like:

• "His family’s just different — they actually enjoy spending time together."

• "They’re not like other parents, they know how to talk to people."

The teen isn’t just praising, they’re aligning with this new group as a way to signal belonging and boost their own self-image.

Triangulation as Emotional Leverage

What begins as admiration often morphs into passive-aggressive triangulation using someone else (usually the partner’s parents) as a way to indirectly criticize others. These comments often sound superficially innocent, but carry a heavy subtext:

• "Well, when his mom does it, she does it because she actually likes helping her family."

• "They love doing things for us, they don’t make a big deal out of it."

• "Her parents never have to be asked twice; they just know how to be there."

These statements are rarely about the partner’s parents alone. They’re comparisons, quiet jabs aimed at making someone else feel less than, often their own family, their friends, or even their partner. The teen avoids direct confrontation while still asserting emotional pressure a classic passive-aggressive move.

The Trap of Social Comparison

Underneath this behavior lies insecurity, often masked by status signaling. The excessive admiration serves as a mirror: this is what I wish I had, what I want to be close to, what I think makes me more valuable. In this context, comments aren’t just admiration; they’re aspirational branding:

• "I just love how they always have their lives together, it makes you want to be better."

• "Their place feels like home, you know?"

But the comparison implies something else isn’t a home. Someone else doesn’t have it together. That’s the sting and often, that’s the intent.

Relational Aggression in Disguise

This behaviour, while often framed as innocent, can edge into relational aggression, a subtler form of social cruelty that operates through manipulation, exclusion, and indirect insults. The person isn’t saying “you’re not enough,” but they’re saying it sideways:

• "It’s just refreshing to be around people who don’t expect anything in return."

• "I never feel judged when I’m with them."

In this context, “them” becomes a contrast and everyone else becomes a problem to endure.

The Real Message: It's Not Always About What's Wrong

The emotional subtext behind constant comparisons often sounds like:
“I feel better when I’m there than when I’m here. They make me feel important — and you don’t.”

But here’s the deeper truth: often, there’s nothing objectively wrong with the people being left behind. They haven’t failed or harmed anyone, they’ve simply stopped being new, exciting, or socially strategic. They’ve become the psychological “outgroup,” not because of their flaws, but because the person idealizing their partner’s family needs contrast to elevate the “ingroup.”

This isn’t about genuine betrayal or mistreatment. It’s about the internal narrative:

• “They just do things differently.”

• “It’s not that I don’t appreciate you… it’s just easier over there.”

These aren’t statements of truth, they’re emotional justifications, often built on imagined hierarchies. The person boasting may not even realize they’re doing it. The triangulation, the praise, the subtle distance; it’s not necessarily a calculated manipulation. It can be unconscious, driven by a desire to feel secure, elevated, or seen in a way they don't (yet) feel in their current environment.

In this way, the damage isn’t done by what’s said directly, it’s done by what’s implied repeatedly:

“This other way of being is better. And the more I align with it, the further I drift from you.”

No one has to do anything wrong for this to hurt. That’s what makes it so destabilizing the shift is based on comparison, not conflict, and often leaves the “outgroup” confused, trying to solve a problem that doesn’t actually exist.

Simply Put: Fertilizing Your Own Grass

The phrase “the grass is always greener” captures more than just envy, it speaks to the habit of externalizing self-worth, especially during adolescence. The behavior of excessively praising a partner’s family, often at the expense of others, isn’t just about admiration. It’s about status, identity, and belonging. Through the lenses of ingroup-outgroup dynamics, passive-aggressive triangulation, social comparison, and relational aggression, we see that this behavior can be both emotionally manipulative and psychologically defensive; often at the same time.

But perhaps the most disorienting aspect is this: the “outgroup” often hasn’t done anything wrong. Families, friends, or partners find themselves quietly devalued not because they’ve failed, but because they’ve stopped being part of someone else’s narrative of aspiration. The damage comes not from overt conflict, but from subtle re-alignment — emotional loyalty shifting toward what ‘feels fresher’, more polished, more validating.

This is why it stings. It’s not just what is being said “they’re so helpful,” “they just get me,” “they make things feel easy.” It’s the implication that others are not enough, no longer valuable, or have been silently replaced. And because it’s rarely spoken outright, the people on the receiving end are left confused, even hurt, by something they can’t quite name.

The healthier path forward for individuals and relationships, lies in recognizing these patterns and resisting the urge to define self-worth through associations. Admiring others is natural. Idealizing them to the point of comparison, alienation, and passive aggression is not. Growth happens not by trading in one tribe for another, but by learning to honor the complexity of the people around us and within us.

The grass may look greener on the other side. But more often than not, it’s just being watered differently. And sometimes, it’s synthetic.

References

Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Brooks/Cole.

Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7(2), 117–140.

Aronson, E., Wilson, T. D., Akert, R. M., & Sommers, S. R. (2022). Social Psychology (11th ed.). Pearson.

Crick, N. R., & Grotpeter, J. K. (1995). Relational aggression, gender, and social-psychological adjustment. Child Development, 66(3), 710–722.

Keltner, D., & Haidt, J. (1999). Social functions of emotions at four levels of analysis. Cognition & Emotion, 13(5), 505–521.

Brown, B. B., & Larson, J. (2009). Peer relationships in adolescence. In R. M. Lerner & L. Steinberg (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 74–103). Wiley.

Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497–529.

Baron, R. A., & Branscombe, N. R. (2012). Social Psychology (13th ed.). Pearson.

Goffman, E. (1959). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Anchor Books.

☰ Table of Contents

Table of Contents