Resilience and Reform: Ukraine’s Fight and Russia’s Road to Liberation
The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author. All information is provided for informational purposes only and is based on publicly available sources believed to be accurate at the time of writing.Russia’s invasion of Ukraine is frequently attributed to Vladimir Putin’s leadership, but the origins of this conflict run deeper than one man. It is rooted in entrenched paranoia, authoritarianism, and historical grievance, systems that extend across Russian society. While these systems perpetuate aggression, they also oppress Russia’s own citizens, many of whom harbour diverse opinions about the war and their future. To build a peaceful future, the world must support Ukraine’s sovereignty while empowering Russians to confront these systemic issues. This essay explores the historical, psychological, and societal dimensions of the conflict and presents pathways to liberation for all involved.
Table of Contents
The Historical and Psychological Roots of Russian Aggression
Russian aggression cannot be separated from its historical insecurities. For centuries, Russia has endured invasions, from Napoleon’s armies to Nazi Germany, which devastated the nation and solidified a "besieged fortress" mentality. This sense of vulnerability has driven Russian leaders to prioritize control over neighbouring regions like Ukraine as a buffer against perceived external threats.
Psychologists argue that such a worldview fosters a defensive paranoia, dividing the world into adversarial camps. Vladimir Putin’s regime amplifies these fears, portraying NATO as an existential threat and framing Ukraine’s democratic ambitions as part of a Western conspiracy. These narratives not only justify external aggression but also suppress dissent within Russia by equating criticism with treason. This psychological manipulation is central to the Kremlin’s ability to sustain both war abroad and authoritarian control at home.
Authoritarianism and Russia’s Internal Dynamics
Russia’s political structure under Putin exacerbates this aggression. His regime relies on fear and dependency, presenting itself as the guarantor of stability and order. Authoritarian systems often foster “learned helplessness,” a condition where citizens come to believe they have no power to effect change. This dynamic is reinforced through propaganda, censorship, and the brutal suppression of dissent.
However, Russian society is not monolithic. While many citizens support or acquiesce to the Kremlin’s narrative due to fear or propaganda, there are significant pockets of resistance and anti-war sentiment. Surveys and anecdotal reports reveal a spectrum of opinions: some Russians support the war, believing it defends Russian interests, while others are deeply opposed, particularly among younger, urban, and more educated demographics. These individuals often face tremendous risks, including imprisonment and exile, for expressing their views.
Russian Public Opinion: A Complex Landscape
Understanding the complexities of Russian public opinion is crucial for charting a path forward. The Kremlin’s control over state media ensures that a significant portion of the population receives a steady diet of pro-war propaganda. Yet this does not imply unanimous support for the war. Opposition movements, though fragmented and repressed, exist within Russia and among its diaspora. Anti-war protests in the early days of the invasion, though swiftly quashed, demonstrated the courage and dissent of many ordinary Russians.
Moreover, sociologists argue that public opinion in authoritarian systems is often opaque, as fear prevents people from expressing their true beliefs. Independent polling and anecdotal evidence suggest that many Russians feel trapped, resigned, or disconnected from the Kremlin’s agenda. Others, while not actively opposing the war, harbour doubts about its rationale or necessity.
By acknowledging this diversity, the international community can craft strategies that distinguish between the Kremlin’s policies and the aspirations of ordinary Russians. This distinction is vital for building bridges and avoiding the alienation that strengthens authoritarian regimes.
Ukraine’s Struggle: Defending Sovereignty and Democratic Principles
In contrast to Russia’s internal struggles, Ukraine’s resistance embodies resilience and a commitment to self-determination. Ukrainians have united in their fight for sovereignty, fueled by a national identity centered on democracy and independence. Their fight is not just about territorial integrity; it is a rejection of authoritarianism and imperialism.
The global community must continue to support Ukraine’s efforts. Increased military aid, economic assistance, and diplomatic solidarity are essential to sustaining its resistance. Sanctions on Russia, while imperfect, have strained its ability to fund the war, and countering Kremlin propaganda remains a critical task.
At the same time, Ukraine must address internal vulnerabilities, such as corruption and economic dependency, to ensure long-term stability. Strengthening democratic institutions and promoting transparency are essential to solidifying the gains made during this challenging period.
A Path Forward for Russia: Empowering Change
For lasting peace, Russia must undergo profound internal transformation. The system of authoritarian control and imperial paranoia cannot sustain a constructive relationship with its neighbors or the world. Empowering Russians to confront these systemic forces is key to breaking the cycle of aggression.
International efforts should focus on amplifying the voices of Russian dissidents and reformers. Independent media outlets like Meduza and Novaya Gazeta offer alternative perspectives to Kremlin propaganda but require sustained support to reach broader audiences. Providing safe havens for exiled activists and funding grassroots educational initiatives can help foster a democratic culture within and outside Russia.
Recognizing the diversity within Russian society is critical to these efforts. The West must avoid blanket assumptions that all Russians support the Kremlin’s actions. By distinguishing between the regime and its people, the international community can foster solidarity with those working toward change.
Toward Reconciliation and Shared Progress
Ending the war in Ukraine and transforming Russia into a more constructive global actor will require parallel efforts. For Ukraine, ongoing military and economic support is essential to securing its sovereignty and rebuilding its society. For Russia, the path forward involves dismantling authoritarian structures and fostering conditions for grassroots reform.
Reconciliation between Ukraine and Russia is unlikely in the near term. Historical examples, such as post-World War II reconciliation in Europe, show that such processes require time, accountability, and mutual recognition of past harms. Supporting these efforts will demand patience and a long-term commitment to justice and peace.
Simply Put: Breaking Chains for a Better Future
The complexities of the Russia-Ukraine conflict reveal the interconnected struggles of two nations: one fighting for survival, the other grappling with the weight of its own oppressive systems. Ukrainians deserve the freedom to determine their destiny, while Russians deserve liberation from the fear and manipulation that bind them to aggression. By supporting both, the international community can help pave the way for a more peaceful and cooperative global order.
History teaches us that entrenched systems of oppression can crumble when people are empowered to imagine and pursue a different future. For Ukraine and Russia alike, that future begins with the courage to resist, the determination to rebuild, and the belief that change is possible. Together, we can break the chains of aggression and oppression, building a world defined by justice, resilience, and shared humanity.
References
Disclaimer: Some links to books may earn ourself affiliate commission if purchased.Plokhy, S. (2015). The Gates of Europe: A History of Ukraine. Basic Books.
Figes, O. (2002). Natasha’s Dance: A Cultural History of Russia. Metropolitan Books.
Snyder, T. (2018). The Road to Unfreedom: Russia, Europe, America. Tim Duggan Books.
Galeotti, M. (2019). We Need to Talk About Putin: Why the West Gets Him Wrong. Ebury Press.
Legvold, R. (2016). Return to Cold War. Polity Press.
Applebaum, A. (2020). Twilight of Democracy: The Seductive Lure of Authoritarianism. Doubleday.
Rogov K. (2023) Kirill Rogov on what Russians really think of the war in Ukraine" The Economist.
Radin, A., & Reach, C. (2017). "Russian Views of the International Order." RAND Corporation.
Gessen, M. (2017). The Future Is History: How Totalitarianism Reclaimed Russia. Riverhead Books.
Duncan, A. (2023). "Imagining Russia’s future after Putin" Chatham House.
Hill, F., & Gaddy, C. G. (2015). Mr. Putin: Operative in the Kremlin. Brookings Institution Press.
Sakwa, R. (2015). Frontline Ukraine: Crisis in the Borderlands. I.B. Tauris.
