From Killing to Climate Change
Resolving Issues in Moral Dilemma Research
Moral dilemma research plays a crucial role in understanding human ethical decision-making and moral reasoning. However, current research predominantly relies on sacrificial moral dilemmas, which present hypothetical scenarios that involve causing harm to achieve a greater good. This think piece argues for the inclusion of climate change dilemmas in moral dilemma research to address the main issues associated with sacrificial moral dilemmas. By exploring climate change dilemmas, we can foster a more sobering, realistic, and contextually relevant understanding of moral decision-making.
Amusing versus Sobering Dilemmas:
Sacrificial moral dilemmas often feature extreme and fantastical scenarios that can be seen as amusing or detached from reality. This amusement factor may compromise the seriousness and depth of participants' moral reasoning. In contrast, climate change dilemmas have real-world implications that are both urgent and sobering, provoking a deeper sense of moral engagement.
Research suggests that the emotional impact of climate change-related dilemmas elicits a stronger sense of moral concern and personal responsibility. By incorporating climate change dilemmas, researchers can evoke emotions and motivations that align more closely with the gravity of real-world moral challenges.
Realism and Representativeness:
Sacrificial moral dilemmas frequently rely on artificial scenarios that are far removed from everyday moral decision-making. These scenarios often involve highly improbable situations and black-and-white choices, failing to capture the complexities and nuances of real-life moral dilemmas. In contrast, climate change dilemmas offer a more realistic and representative context for moral decision-making.
Climate change dilemmas involve complex trade-offs, competing values, and the consideration of long-term consequences. By introducing participants to these morally challenging situations, researchers can better understand the cognitive processes and moral reasoning strategies individuals employ when confronted with real-world ethical dilemmas.
Psychological Processes and Contextual Relevance:
While sacrificial moral dilemmas have contributed to our understanding of moral psychology, they may not capture the full range of psychological processes that operate in diverse moral situations. The context in which moral dilemmas occur influences the decision-making process, including factors such as social norms, cultural values, and situational cues. Climate change dilemmas encompass a broader range of psychological processes, making them more representative of the complexity of moral decision-making.
Research suggests that climate change-related moral dilemmas engage cognitive processes such as empathy, future thinking, and collective responsibility. By incorporating climate change dilemmas, researchers can explore how these additional psychological processes shape moral decision-making and provide insights into interventions aimed at promoting sustainable behaviors.
Simply Put:
Replacing sacrificial moral dilemmas with climate change dilemmas in psychological research can address the main issues associated with current moral dilemma research. By embracing the urgency and complexity of climate change-related ethical challenges, researchers can foster a more sobering, realistic, and contextually relevant understanding of moral decision-making.
By exploring climate change dilemmas, researchers can evoke a stronger sense of moral engagement, capture the complexities of real-world moral dilemmas, and investigate a broader range of psychological processes. Ultimately, this shift can contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of human morality and inform interventions and policies that promote ethical decision-making and address the pressing challenges of climate change.
Sources:
Barkan, R., Ayal, S., & Ariely, D. (2015). Ethical dissonance, justifications, and moral behavior. Current Opinion in Psychology, 6, 157-161.
Friesen, J. P., & Campbell, L. (2020). Pro-environmental moral dilemmas and the role of social identity. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 68, 101400.
Greene, J. D., Sommerville, R. B., Nystrom, L. E., Darley, J. M., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment. Science, 293(5537), 2105-2108.
Kidwell, M., Farmer, A., & Hardesty, D. M. (2013). Getting liberals and conservatives to go green: Political ideology and congruent appeals. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(2), 350-367.
Tetlock, P. E., Kristel, O. V., Elson, S. B., Green, M. C., & Lerner, J. S. (2000). The psychology of the unthinkable: Taboo trade-offs, forbidden base rates, and heretical counterfactuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(5), 853-870.
